UNAM
Ir a UNAM

An Outline of Endodontics

PROFESSOR DR. RICARDO RIVAS MUÑOZ

Ir a FES Iztacala
 

ACADEMIC SUPPORT BY MEANS OF TOPICAL BRIEFINGS
Evidence based dentistry

TOPIC 2: ROOT CANAL ANATOMY
Section 1: Introduction
VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL MéxicoEspaña

COURSE SYLLABI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KEY WORDS
 

 

 
Introduction
Table of Contents

Introduction.
2.1. Permanent dentition
2.1.1. Comparison with external tooth anatomy
2.1.2. Pulp chamber and root canals.
Pulp anatomy axioms

  • radiographic views
  • average length
  • lateral canals
  • apical ramifications
  • root curvatures
  • clinical complications
  • number of canals

of

UPPER TEETH

Central incisor
Lateral incisor
Canine
First bicuspid
Second bicuspid
First molar
Second molar
Third molar


LOWER TEETH

Central and lateralincisors
Canine
First bicuspid
Second bicuspid
First molar
Second molar
Third molar

 
Key words:
 
 

RETURN TO SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION RELATED TO THE TOPIC ROOT CANAL ANATOMY

 

ABSTRACT OF THE QUOTED ARTICLE,

Study of root canal accessibility in human primary molars.

Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

The aim of the present study was to provide a general scheme for pulpectomy of primary molars that may be useful for decision-making about negotiation of root canals and selection of appropriate instruments. A total of 160 vital primary molars in 85 patients (40 males, 45 females) aged 4-6 years were selected. After taking primary radiographs, local anesthesia was induced, and the teeth were isolated using a rubber dam. Canal accessibility index (CAI) and tooth accessibility index (TAI) were calculated according to initial file size. Mandibular first molars had either three canals (79.2%) or four canals (20.8%), and all second molars had four canals. Maxillary first molars had three canals and second molars had either three canals (70.9%) or four canals (29.1%). Lower accessibility of the mandibular first molar distobuccal root accounted for the lower accessibility of these teeth in comparison with mandibular second molars. While three-canal maxillary second molars were more accessible due to the lower accessibility of the distobuccal canal of the maxillary first molar, poor accessibility of the distal canal in four-canal second molars was responsible for the difficult accessibility of these teeth. In conclusion, it seems that the accessibility of a single canal in each tooth determines the difficulty of accessibility for any given tooth. Moreover, while primary second molars are more accessible than first molars, all of them are negotiable.

Aminabadi,  NA.  Study of root canal accessibility in human primary molars. Journal of Oral Science Vol. 50 (2008) , No. 1 March 69-74 Available in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18403887?ordinalpos=56&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.
Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Investigated by Adriana Cuapio González, Student in the group 1501-2009, FES Iztacala, UNAM

 

return to TOPTop

hits counter

 
COURSE SYLLABI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KEY WORDS
 
     
 
¡Estás en territorio PUMA!
rrivas@campus.iztacala.unam.mx    o  dr.ricardo.rivas@gmail.com
     
                                                                                                                                               powered by FreeFind
 
©2008 Diseño: RRM